20,345
edits
Changes
no edit summary
: The '''media''' makes a number of articles which misrepresent scientific ideas. This may be due to the [[bias]] of those writing the article or a misunderstanding of the scientific process and particularly the importance of [[Peer Review|peer review]].
: The '''media''' often makes the following mistakes reporting on scientific [[investigationsinvestigation]]s
:*The article is written before the [[Scientific Paper|scientific paper]] is published allowing the author of the article to make unsubstantiated [[conclusion]]s.
:*The article is written before the [[Scientific Paper|scientific paper]] has been [[Peer Review|peer reviewed]] giving the impression that its [[conclusion]]s are accepted science when they are not.
: [[Scientific Paper]] - "Experimental rejection of observer-independence in the quantum world"
: What happened - An investigation seemed to confirm that two different observers can observe the same phenomenon and come to a different conclusion and both be correct.
: The problem - At the time of the [[article]] the study had not been [[reproducible|reproduced]] or even [[Peer Review|peer reviewed]] to check if the [[method]] was [[valid]].